Lisdianto, Januar Pradipta (2025) Analisis Perbandingan Modifikasi Corewall Pada Gedung C Rumah Sakit UPT Vertikal Surabaya. Undergraduate thesis, UPN VETERAN JAWA TIMUR.
![]() |
Text (Cover)
COVER-halaman.pdf Download (5MB) |
![]() |
Text (Bab 1)
BAB 1.pdf Download (416kB) |
![]() |
Text (Bab 2)
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 20 June 2027. Download (1MB) |
![]() |
Text (Bab 3)
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 20 June 2027. Download (1MB) |
![]() |
Text (Bab 4)
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 20 June 2027. Download (5MB) |
![]() |
Text (Bab 5)
BAB 5.pdf Download (275kB) |
![]() |
Text (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (260kB) |
![]() |
Text (Lampiran)
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 20 June 2027. Download (7MB) |
Abstract
The construction of the Surabaya Vertical UPT Hospital was carried out in the North Surabaya area. The Surabaya Vertical Integrated Service Unit (UPT) Hospital consists of 4 buildings. The brain specialist building (Building C) has 11 floors and 1 basement. In this building there are severalcorewallwhich was used during its construction. The re-planning of this building was carried out by changing the location ofcorewall. Changes to the shearwall are made by changing the positioncorewallapproaching the center of mass and center of stiffness. By changing the position ofcorewallIt is expected that the building has better structural rigidity. In buildings that will be re-planned have irregularities and have a height of more than 40m, the earthquake planning that is carried out must use dynamic earthquakes. In high-rise buildings that are designed using earthquake and wind loads, HBK checks must be carried out. To check the rigidity of the building, several analyses can be carried out, including analysispushover, stability, ductility, and structural performance. This study was conducted to compare the influence of the locationcorewallon the stiffness of the building. and the final results of this study were obtained by conducting severaltrial and fall downwith reference to the center of mass and center of stiffness in the building. And the best results of modification 1 were obtained with a base reaction value in the x direction = 13011 kN and the y direction = 10833 kN. In the stability of the building, the HBK value in the x direction was obtained, ∑Mnc (8820.09 kN) ≥ 1.2. ∑Mnb (4461 kN) and the y direction, ∑Mnc (5205.03 kN) ≥ 1.2. ∑Mnb (2646.1 kN). The deviation value between floors did not exceed the permit limit, namely on the 11th floor in the x direction = 20.192mm and the y direction = 17.472 with a permit limit of 28.077. Based on the pushover analysis, the ductility value in the x direction = 4.38 and the y direction = 3.028. So that the performance of the structure with the maximum deviation ratio in the x direction = 0.0039 and the y direction = 0.0009. From the results of the analysis using the ETABS, SPColoumn and Excel support programs, it is hoped that it can be used as a reference by various parties who want to plancorewall.
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contributors: |
|
||||||||||||
Subjects: | T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) T Technology > TH Building construction |
||||||||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Engineering > Departement of Civil Engineering | ||||||||||||
Depositing User: | - Januar Pradipta Lisdianto | ||||||||||||
Date Deposited: | 20 Jun 2025 06:25 | ||||||||||||
Last Modified: | 20 Jun 2025 06:25 | ||||||||||||
URI: | https://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/id/eprint/38813 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |