Abyansyah, Hikmal Abraar (2024) Pembingkaian Berita Performa Debat Cawapres Gibran Rakabuming Dalam Debat Pilpres Keempat (Analisis Framing Robert N. Entman Pada Media Online Tempo.co Dan Rmol.id Periode Januari 2024). Undergraduate thesis, UPN Veteran Jawa Timur.
![[img]](https://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (Cover)
20043010255.-cover.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text (Bab 1)
20043010255.-bab1.pdf Download (266kB) |
|
Text (Bab 2)
20043010255.-bab2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 13 December 2026. Download (400kB) |
|
Text (Bab 3)
20043010255.-bab3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 13 December 2026. Download (273kB) |
|
Text (Bab 4)
20043010255.-bab4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 13 December 2026. Download (508kB) |
|
Text (Bab 5)
20043010255.-bab5.pdf Download (187kB) |
|
Text (Daftar pustaka)
20043010255.-daftarpustaka.pdf Download (195kB) |
|
Text (Lampiran)
20043010255.-lampiran.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
In the fourth presidential debate, held on January 21, 2024, the main focus was on efforts to develop society and the economy while considering environmental sustainability. An intriguing aspect of this debate was the performance of the vice presidential candidates, especially in their attacks on their debate opponents. One of the most notable and worthy of further examination was the political gimmicks and attack strategies employed by Gibran Rakabuming, which many deemed highly offensive. Gibran’s debate gimmicks during the fourth presidential debate sparked both support and criticism, with the media playing a major role in framing the news and shaping perspectives. This study discusses the framing analysis of vice presidential candidate Gibran Rakabuming’s debate performance in the fourth presidential debate as covered by the online media outlets Tempo.co and Rmol.id in the January 2024 period. The research adopts a constructivist paradigm using Robert N. Entman’s framing analysis method, which consists of problem definition, identifying the causes of the problem, making moral judgments, and proposing solutions. The results of this study show that Tempo.co and Rmol.id framed the same event, Gibran Rakabuming’s debate performance in the fourth presidential debate, from different perspectives. Tempo.co tended to perceive Gibran’s performance as trivial, inappropriate, and unnecessary, whereas Rmol.id viewed Gibran’s actions as bold and reflective of youthful expression. Keywords: Framing, Debate, Politics, Presidential Election, Gibran Rakabuming
| Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
||||||||
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social and Political Sciences > Departement of Communication | ||||||||
| Depositing User: | Hikmal Abraar Abyansyah | ||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 13 Dec 2024 02:22 | ||||||||
| Last Modified: | 13 Dec 2024 02:22 | ||||||||
| URI: | https://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/id/eprint/33095 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |