WIDYANTI, THERESIA RISKA (2022) RECEPTION ANALYSIS TERHADAP KONTEN YOUTUBE “SELINGKUH GAK BAKAL ADA OBATNYA! - CATWOMANIZER | REAL TALK #3”. Undergraduate thesis, UPN "VETERAN" JAWA TIMUR.
|
Text (COVER)
COVER THERESIA.pdf Download (740kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB I)
BAB I THERESIA.pdf Download (505kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (BAB II)
BAB II THERESIA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (278kB) |
|
|
Text (BAB III)
BAB III THERESIA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (185kB) |
|
|
Text (BAB IV)
BAB IV THERESIA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (327kB) |
|
|
Text (BAB V)
BAB V THERESIA.pdf Download (92kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA THERESIA.pdf Download (174kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (LAMPIRAN)
LAMPIRAN THERESIA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (237kB) |
Abstract
One of Catmonizer's youtube content provides "Toxic Relationship" knowledge about infidelity while still dating the opposite sex. In public receptions, the affair may be carried out as long as the consequences will be borne in the end if it is known by the partner. Meanwhile, in the real world, infidelity should not be carried out because there is no mutual trust in each other, causing an affair. The research method uses a qualitative approach to Stuart Hall's reception analysis to understand public receptions in the Catwomenizer youtube channel content about cases of infidelity. Data collection techniques were carried out in group discussion forums and in-dept interviews. The results of the study show that people do not want cases of infidelity, for various reasons. If the infidelity case happens to the community, they will follow up according to the initial commitment with their partner. From the research, according to Stuart Hall, which is classified as (Dominant Hegemonic Code), none of the informants wants what their partner has done if their partner has an affair. (Oppositional Code) informant one, informant three, informant six, informant eight and informant nine refused in any case of infidelity, if the couple did that, there was no apology for him. However, the informant did not agree with the arguments in the youtube content. There are those who accept but with reasons (Negotiated Code), namely informant two, informant four, informant five, and informant seven. They think that if my partner later will have an affair there will be a witness that it may not be changed again, according to their respective personalities. With the case of infidelity in Surabaya during dating, we, the next generation, are more in choosing a partner when dating, so that there are not many divorce cases to the level of marriage. Keywords: Toxic Relationships; Reception Analysis; Youtube Channel
| Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
||||||||
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P87 Communication. Mass Media | ||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social and Political Sciences > Departement of Communication | ||||||||
| Depositing User: | THERESIA RISKA WIDYANTI | ||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 24 Jan 2022 02:55 | ||||||||
| Last Modified: | 07 Nov 2022 08:12 | ||||||||
| URI: | http://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/id/eprint/4694 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |