TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEWENANGAN CONSTITUSIONAL REVIEW POSITIVE LEGISLATURE MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 135/PUU-XXII/2024)

Sastika, Atthahirah Nariswari (2026) TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEWENANGAN CONSTITUSIONAL REVIEW POSITIVE LEGISLATURE MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 135/PUU-XXII/2024). Undergraduate thesis, UPN Veteran Jawa Timur.

[img]
Preview
Text (Cover)
Cover Skrip.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Bab 1)
BAB 1.pdf

Download (303kB) | Preview
[img] Text (Bab 2)
BAB 2.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only until 5 May 2029.

Download (192kB)
[img] Text (Bab 3)
BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only until 5 May 2029.

Download (116kB)
[img]
Preview
Text (Bab 4)
BAB 4.pdf

Download (48kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (51kB) | Preview
[img] Text (Lampiran)
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only until 5 May 2029.

Download (3MB)

Abstract

The Constitutional Court, in the exercise of its judicial power, is vested with the authority to conduct a constitutional review. In order to exercise its constitutional review authority in the most effective manner, the Constitutional Court should adopt a limited role as a negative legislature. The Constitutional Court's decision in the case of Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 represents the culmination of a comprehensive review of the provisions governing the simultaneous election scheme, as delineated in Law No. 7 of 2017. The Constitutional Court, in issuing the a quo decision, is considered to have exceeded its authority by acting as a positive legislature. This research is of significance in that it examines the scope of the Constitutional Court's constitutional review authority and the conformity of Decision 135/PUU-XXII/2024 with its authority. The present research was conducted using a normative legal research method with a conceptual and legislative approach. The results of the study indicate an inconsistency in the authority of the Constitutional Court in deciding Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024. Consequently, it is imperative to reinforce the mechanisms of checks and balances and to establish a framework of norms that delineate the limits of the Constitutional Court's authority.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Thesis advisorKartika, Adhitya WidyaNIP199001122020122003adhityawidyakartika@ymail.com
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law
Depositing User: Atthahirah Nariswari Sastika
Date Deposited: 05 May 2026 05:57
Last Modified: 05 May 2026 06:15
URI: https://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/id/eprint/51583

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item