Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Pada Tahap Pra-Proyek Atas Pembatalan Sepihak Pembangunan Apartemen Oleh Developer (Studi Putusan Nomor 794/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Sby)

Renanda, Vella Septia (2025) Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Pada Tahap Pra-Proyek Atas Pembatalan Sepihak Pembangunan Apartemen Oleh Developer (Studi Putusan Nomor 794/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Sby). Undergraduate thesis, UPN Veteran Jawa Timur.

	Text (COVER) COVER.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text (BAB I) BAB I.pdf Download (494kB)
	Text (BAB II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 September 2027. Download (353kB)
	Text (BAB III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 September 2027. Download (316kB)
	Text (BAB IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 September 2027. Download (258kB)
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 September 2027. Download (255kB)
	Text (LAMPIRAN) LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (3MB)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the validity of a sales and purchase agreement (PPJB) in the pre-project stage and the legal consequences of a developer's unilateral cancellation of an apartment development, including legal protection for buyers. At the pre-project stage, apartment sales and purchase transactions are still preliminary agreements, which creates legal uncertainty regarding ownership. The study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach, case studies, and a conceptual approach. The results indicate that the validity of a PPJB refers to the valid conditions of an agreement according to Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Unilateral cancellation by a developer harms buyers who previously owned rights to the apartment unit. Although there are legal protections, both preventive and repressive, their implementation is ineffective due to a lack of good faith and transparency on the part of the developer. Conflicting court decisions between the first and appellate levels demonstrate the tension between substantive and procedural justice, ultimately weakening legal certainty for consumers. In this situation, public pressure can be an alternative to hold developers accountable.

Item Type:

Thesis (Undergraduate)

Contributors: