Implementasi Penyitaan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bank BUMD Dalam Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara (Studi Kasus Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Malang)

HARITS, SIFA AULIA (2025) Implementasi Penyitaan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bank BUMD Dalam Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara (Studi Kasus Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Malang). Undergraduate thesis, UPN Veteran Jawa Timur.

	Text (COVER) 21071010067.-COVER.pdf Download (3MB)
	Text (BAB I) 21071010067.- BAB I.pdf Download (421kB)
	Text (BAB II) 21071010067.- BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 July 2027. Download (351kB)
	Text (BAB III) 21071010067.- BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 July 2027. Download (195kB)
	Text (BAB IV) 21071010067.- BAB IV.pdf Download (179kB)
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) 21071010067.- DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (241kB)
	Text (LAMPIRAN) 21071010067.- LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (3MB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Corruption is a cruel crime because it can harm the state, corruption crimes at this time are also widely carried out in the banking sector, one of which is the banking sector of BUMD banks. Asset Confiscation is one of the efforts of the District Attorney's Office which is carried out as an effort to recover state losses experienced as a result of the commission of a criminal act, namely corruption. This study aims to find out how the implementation of the confiscation of assets for corruption crimes of BUMD Banks in an effort to recover state losses carried out by the Malang District Attorney's Office. This study uses an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach. The data obtained in this study were obtained through observations, literature studies, and interviews with the Prosecutor of the Investigation Subdivision and the Head of the Prosecution Subdivision of the Malang District Attorney's Office. The results of this study show that the Malang District Attorney's Office has carried out asset confiscation in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, and Regulation Number 16 of 2004 concerning Guidelines for Asset Recovery. However, in its implementation, it still faces various obstacles or obstacles such as too short a time, family and community who are reluctant to cooperate, and asset ownership in different regions. Therefore, a more detailed and definite legal basis regulation is needed as a rule for the process of implementing asset confiscation carried out by the prosecutor's office in an effort to recover state losses, one of which is the ratification of the Asset Forfeiture Bill to provide a deterrent effect and reduce the level of corruption crimes in Indonesia. Keywords: Prosecutor's Office, Corruption, Return of State Losses.Asset Confiscation.

Item Type:

Thesis (Undergraduate)

Contributors: