ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KLAUSUL FORCE MAJEURE DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGANGKUTAN (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI BANGIL NOMOR 10/PDT/G/2023/PN.BIL DAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA NOMOR 1237/PDT.G/2018/PN.SBY)

Maharani, Clara Elena Lintang (2025) ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KLAUSUL FORCE MAJEURE DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGANGKUTAN (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI BANGIL NOMOR 10/PDT/G/2023/PN.BIL DAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA NOMOR 1237/PDT.G/2018/PN.SBY). Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur.

	Text (COVER) (COVER).pdf Download (10MB)
	Text (BAB I) (BAB I).pdf Download (362kB)
	Text (BAB II) (BAB II).pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 23 July 2027. Download (261kB)
	Text (BAB III) (BAB III).pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 23 July 2027. Download (244kB)
	Text (BAB IV) (BAB IV).pdf Download (102kB)
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) (DAFTAR PUSTAKA).pdf Download (111kB)
	Text (LAMPIRAN) (LAMPIRAN).pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (13MB)

Abstract

The transportation agreement is a reciprocal agreement between the carrier and the owner/sender of the goods. In the implementation of transportation business activities, robbery is known as a general risk, so the carrier is responsible for the safety and security of goods during transportation. The case in Bangil District Court Decision Number 10/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Bil. states that the loss of the owner of the goods for the loss of the object of transportation due to robbery is a force majeure, because the carrier is able to prove the occurrence of the robbery. The concept of force majeure results in the loss of working power in the agreement, so that the liability in this case becomes blurred, because after all, Article 1367 of the Civil Code states that performance has a burden of responsibility. Keywords: Transportation, Robbery, Force Majeure, Liability.

Item Type:

Thesis (Undergraduate)

Contributors: