Mukhsin, Fazrul Rahman (2025) Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Pasal Terhadap Permufakatan Jahat (Samenspanning) Dan Penyertaan (Deelneming) Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2398/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn Sby Dan Putusan Nomor 96/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn Jkt.Brt). Undergraduate thesis, UPN Veteran Jawa Timur.
![]() |
Text (Cover)
2071010068.-cover.pdf Download (2MB) |
![]() |
Text (BAB I)
21071010068.-bab1.pdf Download (498kB) |
![]() |
Text (BAB II)
21071010068.-bab2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 June 2027. Download (368kB) |
![]() |
Text (BAB III)
21071010068.-bab3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 June 2027. Download (337kB) |
![]() |
Text (BAB IV)
21071010068.-bab4.pdf Download (186kB) |
![]() |
Text (Daftar Pustaka)
21071010068.-daftarpustaka.pdf Download (230kB) |
![]() |
Text (Lampiran)
21071010068.-lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (3MB) |
Abstract
In the enforcement of Narcotics Crimes, there is still legal uncertainty in the form of disparity in the application of articles to Criminal Acts committed by more than 1 person. One example of a case of disparity in the application of the article is the difference in the application of articles to perpetrators of more than 1 person in Decision Number 2398/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn Sby and Decision Number 96/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn Jkt.Brt. The results of this study indicate that there are differences in the interpretation of Article 132 paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law among law enforcers in Indonesia and also the application of the article by the Public Prosecutor is not in accordance with the Attorney General's Guidelines No. 11 of 2021 and also the disparity arises due to differences in the interpretation of Article 132 paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law among law enforcers in Indonesia, thus having implications for and legal certainty in handling narcotics cases. The purpose of this study is to determine the concept of participation (deelneming) and conspiracy (samenspanning) in criminal law in Indonesia and to determine the application of the articles on Conspiracy (Samenspanning) and Participation (deelneming) in Decision Number 2398 / Pid.Sus / 2021 / PN Sby and Decision Number 96 / Pid.Sus / 2023 / PN Jkt.Brt. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory regulatory approach (Statute Approach), a conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach), and a case approach (Case Approach)
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contributors: |
|
||||||||
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | ||||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Law > Departement of Law | ||||||||
Depositing User: | Fazrul Rahman Mukhsin | ||||||||
Date Deposited: | 12 Jun 2025 07:58 | ||||||||
Last Modified: | 12 Jun 2025 07:58 | ||||||||
URI: | https://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/id/eprint/37371 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |