Hatta, Arman Arroisi (2025) KAJIAN YURIDIS “ALASAN SANGAT MENDESAK” DALAM PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN DI PENGADILAN NEGERI (STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN NOMOR: 605/PDT.P/2023/PN SBY DAN PENETAPAN NOMOR: 125/PDT.P/2024/PN YYK). Undergraduate thesis, UPN Veteran Jawa Timur.
Text (Cover)
20071010268.-cover.pdf Download (3MB) |
|
Text (Bab 1)
20071010268.-bab1.pdf Download (239kB) |
|
Text (Bab 2)
20071010268.-bab2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 18 January 2027. Download (315kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (Bab 3)
20071010268.-bab3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 18 January 2027. Download (199kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (Bab 4)
20071010268.-bab4.pdf Download (75kB) |
|
Text (Daftar Pustaka)
20071010268.-daftarpustaka.pdf Download (183kB) |
|
Text (Lampiran)
20071010268.-lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 18 January 2027. Download (3MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
The phrase "highly urgent reasons" in Article 7, paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 of 2019 on Marriage, which pertains to marriage dispensation, is a vague norm (vage normen) that has not been explicitly defined in the article's explanation. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the basis for judicial consideration in interpreting the phrase "highly urgent reasons" in the rulings of 605/Pdt.P/2023/PN Sby and 125/Pdt.P/2024/PN Yyk, examines the justification for the differences in interpretation between these two rulings, and analyze the legal consequences. This research is a normative legal study, utilizing both a legislative and case-based approach. The findings of this research indicate that: (1) the judges in the rulings of 605/Pdt.P/2023/PN Sby and 125/Pdt.P/2024/PN Yyk interpreted the phrase "highly urgent reasons" differently; (2) this difference in interpretation was influenced by the psychological processes and personal experiences of the judges; (3) The legal consequence of granting the request in Decision No. 605/Pdt.P/2023/PN Sby is the establishment of legal certainty for the marriage registration, which subsequently creates civil rights for the parties after the marriage is registered. In contrast, the rejection of the request in Decision No. 125/Pdt.P/2024/PN Yyk results in legal uncertainty regarding the protection of the child within the marriage.
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contributors: |
|
||||||||
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | ||||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Law > Departement of Law | ||||||||
Depositing User: | Arman Arroisi Hatta | ||||||||
Date Deposited: | 20 Jan 2025 03:32 | ||||||||
Last Modified: | 20 Jan 2025 03:32 | ||||||||
URI: | https://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/id/eprint/33924 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |